黑料海角91入口

For IT administrators and Managed Service Providers, secure Identity and Access Management (IAM) capabilities is vital to operational security success. Organizations need to manage the digital identities of users and assets throughout the network, and they need tools that make this process efficient without compromising security or compliance.

Okta is a well-known identity provider whose customers include some of the world鈥檚 most reputable multinational enterprises. However, it鈥檚 much less popular among small to mid-sized enterprises and MSPs, who can鈥檛 afford the economies of scale that Okta offers. That鈥檚 why many IT and security leaders are considering Okta alternatives like 黑料海角91入口.

This article provides deep insight into the differences between these two products. Read on to find out which platform is the right choice for your organization.

Which Problems Do You Need to Solve?

Both Okta and 黑料海角91入口 provide comprehensive identity access management to customers, but with a few key differences. The main difference between Okta and 黑料海角91入口 is the target customer. Okta is built for large-scale enterprises that can fully leverage its capabilities strictly for IAM security. 黑料海角91入口 offers a more comprehensive suite of identity, access, and device management capabilities better-suited to smaller organizations and MSPs.

This is important because different types of customers have different problems they want to solve. An enterprise that is already using dozens of different security tools across a complex organizational structure has completely different needs compared to a growing company that might prefer a more streamlined, all-in-one solution.

Let鈥檚 cover how Okta and 黑料海角91入口 express these differences more specifically:

Identity Lifecycle Management 

IT administrators need to manage every user鈥檚 association with the organization from the moment they are hired. Effective identity governance and streamlined onboarding are critical to ensuring a robust security posture. Okta and 黑料海角91入口 provide high-quality results in these categories.

Okta and 黑料海角91入口 offer full-featured identity governance capabilities

Every organization needs formal policies that define the resources users have access to, and their IAM solution must enforce these policies effectively. Both Okta and 黑料海角91入口 have robust capabilities for ensuring employees have access to the resources they need and revoking access when it is no longer needed.

Identity governance is an important element of many regulatory frameworks, and both Okta and 黑料海角91入口 offer solutions that help organizations achieve compliance. Both Okta and 黑料海角91入口 can automatically detect user status changes and make proactive recommendations to administrators in response.

黑料海角91入口 has an edge when it comes to easy onboarding

Okta and 黑料海角91入口 allow administrators to define user access policies, create group policies, and automatically authorize users according to their membership in groups. However, only 黑料海角91入口 allows administrators to automatically import Microsoft 365 users and schedule account activation ahead of time.

Technically, Okta administrators can achieve similar results by creating an automated workflow that includes scheduling account activation. However, it鈥檚 not a streamlined process. It takes considerably more time and attention from IT administrators than 黑料海角91入口 requires.

Authentication

Proper authentication management is a vital part of identity-based security. This is especially true for organizations adopting Zero Trust principles that treat all connections as potential attack vectors. However, authentication policies still need to offer an easy, streamlined user experience that avoids becoming an obstacle to productivity.

Okta and 黑料海角91入口 support multi-factor authentication (MFA)

Multi-factor authentication is a core feature for Zero Trust, and a cost-effective way to dramatically improve security in general. Both Okta and 黑料海角91入口 support a variety of multi-factor authentication protocols, including one-time passwords, mobile push notifications, and FIDO-compliant passwordless options.

Okta takes the lead with single sign-on (SSO) capabilities

Both companies are invested in making their multi-factor authentication capabilities as low-friction as possible. SSO reduces the user friction that arises when users have to repeatedly authenticate themselves when accessing different IT assets and resources. Both Okta and 黑料海角91入口 support best-in-class SSO features like conditional access and MFA escalation.

The one thing that puts Okta in front of 黑料海角91入口 here is its risk scoring feature. With Okta, administrators can quickly see and communicate risk scores associated with specific users based on their SSO activity and orchestrate workflows based on this score.

黑料海角91入口 offers superior password management features

While both Okta and 黑料海角91入口 support password policy management directly through their respective interfaces, they have slightly different capabilities. For example, Okta does not support on-device password vaults, nor does it include a full-featured password manager for desktops and mobile devices.

黑料海角91入口 does provide device-hosted password vaults and includes a built-in password manager suitable for PCs, laptops, and mobile devices running Android or iOS. It also allows users to share passwords with one another through a secure in-app channel 鈥� instead of implicitly encouraging them to do it on their own using unsecured shadow IT apps.

Passwordless authentication is easier to implement with 黑料海角91入口

Okta and 黑料海角91入口 are members of the FIDO Alliance, a nonprofit group dedicated to establishing usable standards for passwordless authentication. Customers can easily onboard FIDO-compliant technologies that support passwordless authentication through either platform.

黑料海角91入口鈥檚 interface and endpoint-driven approach makes it easier for end users to use compliant passwordless authentication processes on their own, without requiring an administrator to perform extra tasks. Okta is designed for large enterprises that can reliably allocate administrator resources to these types of tasks on an as-needed basis.

Both platforms support the principle of least privilege

Users should only gain access to the resources they need when they need them 鈥� and retain access only while it鈥檚 needed. Okta and 黑料海角91入口 include valuable features for preventing user accounts from getting overprovisioned. This is typically achieved through automated just-in-time provisioning that provides and automatically revokes access on an as-needed basis.

The main difference between Okta and 黑料海角91入口 is in the way each platform expresses the principle of least privilege. Okta focuses more on managing IT assets across complex enterprise networks, while 黑料海角91入口 provides more in-depth visibility and control to mobile devices and endpoints in general.

Endpoint Management 

Your organization鈥檚 IAM strategy must take the security posture of your endpoint devices into account. For the large enterprises that make up a major part of Okta鈥檚 customer base, this is usually the task of a separate third-party endpoint management tool. 

On its own, Okta does not provide much in the way of endpoint deployment or management. It does include a Device Inventory feature that allows administrators to collect and analyze device data, but it鈥檚 not a core use case for the platform. Okta is designed to integrate with purpose-built solutions for deploying and managing endpoints.

Deploying endpoint devices is easier through 黑料海角91入口

With 黑料海角91入口, IT administrators can easily onboard and provision endpoints according to predefined group policies. This reduces the amount of time and effort that goes into endpoint deployment and minimizes the additional training requirements for new administrators. There is no need to integrate 黑料海角91入口 with complex on-premises infrastructure or install other software beforehand.

黑料海角91入口 also wins when it comes to secure device management

黑料海角91入口 customers enjoy all-in-one endpoint management solutions directly through its own interface. Administrators can write custom scripts and distribute them directly to endpoints, executing them through 黑料海角91入口鈥檚 web-based console. This allows administrators and security teams to remotely execute commands, distribute software, and encrypt disks directly on endpoint devices.

Directory Services, Supported Protocols, and Customization

Okta and 黑料海角91入口 have very different architectures, designed for different types of customers. While Okta stays firmly in its secure IAM management lane, 黑料海角91入口 provides a more comprehensive all-in-one solution for mobile device management and security. This reflects Okta鈥檚 position as a niche enterprise tool and 黑料海角91入口鈥檚 more comprehensive approach for small and growing enterprises.

黑料海角91入口 provides built-in directory services ideal for smaller organizations

Every organization needs to record account names, access policies, and confidential user data on a secure, centralized repository. Large enterprises typically do this using Microsoft Active Directory (AD) or a Linux-based Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP). Smaller organizations don鈥檛 always have a separate, dedicated solution in place for this.

黑料海角91入口 provides a unified directory that supports the centralized management of supported resources. There is no need to deploy AD or LDAP infrastructure separately before using 黑料海角91入口. Instead, the 黑料海角91入口 endpoint agent connects to the 黑料海角91入口 service through direct, one-way channels that provide a streamlined directory solution without the need for additional complications.

黑料海角91入口 supports more federated enterprise protocols than Okta

黑料海角91入口 doesn鈥檛 require customers to use its built-in directory services. Enterprise customers can also connect it to a wide range of identity management protocols. Importantly, it supports several popular protocols that Okta doesn鈥檛, like Remote Authentication Dial-In User Service (RADIUS) and LDAP.

This ensures that IT leaders at small and mid-sized enterprises do not have the burden of building and maintaining individual connections to resources accessed through these protocols. For Okta to support RADIUS and LDAP, administrators must add supporting agents that contribute to the complexity of the enterprise tech stack.

Both platforms offer comprehensive custom integration options

黑料海角91入口 offers customers the ability to build custom integrations to third-party service providers offering RESTful APIs. It also supports SCIM and other protocols for achieving in-depth customization. The same is true of Okta, thanks to its federated architecture that explicitly relies on building out a wide range of third-party integrations.

Pricing Comparisons

Okta has a complex pricing structure that includes a $1500 annual minimum. It does not provide volume pricing discounts to organizations with less than 5000 users. Here is a breakdown of Okta鈥檚 pricing structure compared to 黑料海角91入口:

Concerns and Other Considerations

Although Okta鈥檚 standard pricing might appear slightly lower than 黑料海角91入口鈥檚 top-tier Plus subscription, IT leaders should factor in the additional costs that come with Okta鈥檚 complex implementation requirements.These may not be a major factor for large-scale enterprises that already have the necessary infrastructure in place, but it鈥檚 virtually guaranteed to be an obstacle for smaller organizations.

This is especially true when advanced server access comes into the picture. Depending on the organization鈥檚 real-world server access needs, this additional charge can dramatically impact the total cost of ownership associated with Okta.

At the same time, IT leaders should consider the value of deploying a consolidated IT infrastructure that includes mobile device management. Building comprehensive efficiencies into IT workflows carries cumulative gains as the organization grows. Like many other differences between the two platforms, this will carry more weight with IT leaders at growing companies.

Which Is Right for You?

Okta has positioned itself as a major provider of IAM services to large enterprises and government organizations. It is designed for environments that already have complex tech stacks in place, with multiple third-party vendors addressing different specialized needs.

黑料海角91入口鈥檚 centralized approach is a better solution for small and medium-sized enterprise IT administrators and managed service providers. These types of organizations benefit from having a streamlined tech stack that focuses on a smaller number of more comprehensive providers. 

If your organization does not have the resources to build out an entire enterprise tech stack, 黑料海角91入口 is the clear winner between the two. This also applies to managed service vendors whose strategic goals revolve around deploying cost-effective technologies that provide optimal value.

Get Started With 黑料海角91入口

We encourage IT administrators to carefully review all the options on the market before choosing an identity management partner for their organization. Find out how 黑料海角91入口 has earned its place as one of the industry鈥檚 most reputable names by scheduling a guiding product simulation or an in-depth demo today.

You can also get started with a free trial at any time.

Securely connect to any resource using Google Workspace and 黑料海角91入口.

Learn More